Is Your Interview Scheduling Stuck at 'No Availability from the Interviewer'? 'Tasonal' Scheduling AI Directly Negotiates with Interviewers to Create Slots – Free Trial Launched and Free Plan Temporarily Expanded

SAIRAI Co., Ltd. (Headquarters: Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Representative Director and CEO: Mizuki Hirai), which provides AI services in the HR field, announced that it has expanded the beta free trial of the scheduling AI agent on its AI recruitment platform 'Tasonal'. They have launched a campaign increasing the number of monthly scheduling adjustments on the free plan from the usual 5 to 30, available for 3 months. Furthermore, we have prepared a '1-month free trial' for paid plans (Starter, Standard, MAX). Please take this opportunity to try it out.

Scheduling hiring interviews heavily consumes recruiters' time, requiring back-and-forth work as a 'middleman' between candidates and interviewers, compounded by follow-ups and readjustments when there are no open slots. Moreover, the longer the adjustment takes, the more likely top candidates will be lost to other companies' selection processes.

Tasonal's scheduling AI agent not only handles automatic schedule matching accommodating candidate text inputs but also directly approaches interviewers via Slack to create new slots when they have no availability. It achieves scheduling where the recruiter 'does not step in the middle', creating a hiring experience that doesn't keep candidates waiting.

Background: The structural problems hidden in interview scheduling As competition in the recruitment market intensifies, interview scheduling is no longer mere clerical work but a bottleneck that dictates hiring outcomes. Many recruiters face the following challenges daily:

1. Becoming a 'middleman' between candidates and interviewers Checking the candidate's preferred dates, checking the interviewer's calendar, finding available times, and proposing them to the candidate. Because this back-and-forth is done for every single candidate, recruiters' time gets squeezed by scheduling tasks.

2. Hitting a dead end when the interviewer has no openings When no open slots can be found on the calendar, the recruiter's only option is to chase down interviewers one by one via Slack or email, negotiating individually by asking, 'Could you make this time available?' This task of prompting, coordinating, and readjusting is the most burdensome part of the scheduling work.

3. Scheduling delays directly lead to candidate drop-offs The longer scheduling takes, the more candidates drift to other companies. Especially with top-tier candidates who run parallel processes with multiple companies, the speed of confirmation directly ties to the drop-off rate.

Why Tasonal's scheduling AI agent is superior Existing URL-based scheduling tools operate on a system of 'having the candidate choose from available slots'