[Generative AI Usage is an Unexpected 'Revision Hell'?] 60% Respond That 4 or More Revisions Are Necessary! Practitioners Desperately Want 'Consistency Maintenance' and 'Partial Rewriting'
A survey by PRIZMA Inc. reveals that over 90% of generative AI users repeatedly make revisions, with over 70% feeling exhausted by the process, highlighting the reality of 'revision hell' in the workplace.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: March 30, 2026 at 23:00
- 🔍 Collected: March 30, 2026 at 22:56
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: April 22, 2026 at 05:34 (534h 38m after Collected)
Many companies are advancing the introduction of generative AI for the purpose of operational efficiency.
However, it is presumed that on the frontlines, issues such as 'not getting the intended deliverable on the first try' and 'fine-tuning taking too much time' are becoming a burden for workers. So, what kind of revision-related stress are they actually facing in the real business world?
Therefore, PRIZMA Inc. (https://www.prizma-link.com/press) conducted a 'Survey on the Reality of Revising Deliverables by Generative AI', targeting men and women in their 20s to 50s who routinely use 'generative AI' in their business and have used 'image/video generation via generative AI' for work.
The reality became clear that over 90% of generative AI users repeatedly make multiple revisions, resulting in time losses of several hours. Particularly in image generation and manga creation, not being able to adjust details exactly as envisioned has become a significant challenge on the production floor.
In this article, we excerpt and introduce a portion of the survey results.
The full survey results are published in a document, which can be [Free Downloaded] from the link below.
▼ Survey Results Report
https://www.prizma-link.com/press/whitepaper/form/whitepaper133?utm_source=prtimes
---
## [Over 70% are exhausted by 'revision work'.] Generative AI 'revisions' can cause losses of several hours per project.
First, when asked, 'Do you feel burdened by the time and effort required for the "revision and fine-tuning" of AI-generated deliverables?', over 70% responded with 'Feel it very much (20.1%)' or 'Feel it somewhat (56.3%)'.
Tools that were originally introduced for the purpose of streamlining operations and saving time...
However, it is presumed that on the frontlines, issues such as 'not getting the intended deliverable on the first try' and 'fine-tuning taking too much time' are becoming a burden for workers. So, what kind of revision-related stress are they actually facing in the real business world?
Therefore, PRIZMA Inc. (https://www.prizma-link.com/press) conducted a 'Survey on the Reality of Revising Deliverables by Generative AI', targeting men and women in their 20s to 50s who routinely use 'generative AI' in their business and have used 'image/video generation via generative AI' for work.
The reality became clear that over 90% of generative AI users repeatedly make multiple revisions, resulting in time losses of several hours. Particularly in image generation and manga creation, not being able to adjust details exactly as envisioned has become a significant challenge on the production floor.
In this article, we excerpt and introduce a portion of the survey results.
The full survey results are published in a document, which can be [Free Downloaded] from the link below.
▼ Survey Results Report
https://www.prizma-link.com/press/whitepaper/form/whitepaper133?utm_source=prtimes
---
## [Over 70% are exhausted by 'revision work'.] Generative AI 'revisions' can cause losses of several hours per project.
First, when asked, 'Do you feel burdened by the time and effort required for the "revision and fine-tuning" of AI-generated deliverables?', over 70% responded with 'Feel it very much (20.1%)' or 'Feel it somewhat (56.3%)'.
Tools that were originally introduced for the purpose of streamlining operations and saving time...