Approximately 80% of Students Fear 'Loss of Individuality' in Document Screening Due to Generative AI Adoption; AI-Savvy Students Are More Positive Toward 'AI Interviews'

Leverages Inc., operator of the AI HR platform 'NALYSYS,' surveyed 328 students (classes of 2027-2029) regarding 'AI interviews.' Results show that approximately 80% of students fear the homogenization of document screening due to the rise of generative AI. Meanwhile, about one in three students have a positive impression of AI interviews, indicating an expectation for objective evaluations.
調査NQ 90/100出典:PR Times

📋 Article Processing Timeline

  • 📰 Published: May 26, 2026 at 20:00
  • 🔍 Collected: May 26, 2026 at 11:31
  • 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 26, 2026 at 23:04 (11h 32m after Collected)
NALYSYS (https://nalysys.jp/service/), an AI HR platform operated by Leverages Inc., conducted an awareness survey on 'AI interviews' targeting 328 students expected to graduate between 2027 and 2029. Approximately 80% of students feel anxious about document screening due to the spread of generative AI. AI-savvy students tend to feel a stronger sense of crisis regarding 'homogenization' and 'academic background filters.' Anxiety about human-led interviews is dominated by concerns about 'interviewer lottery' (luck of the draw). Students seek 'objective and fair evaluation' in interviews. More than one in three students have a positive impression of 'AI interviews.' However, there is also anxiety about whether 'passion' can be conveyed. More than half of students are anxious about 'preparation' for AI interviews. Lack of transparency in evaluation criteria and lack of experience are psychological hurdles. 1. Approximately 80% of students feel anxious about document screening due to generative AI; AI-savvy students feel a stronger crisis regarding 'homogenization.' When asked about their usage of generative AI in daily life, university assignments, and job hunting, about one in four students replied they use it 'almost every day' (25.9%). Combined with students who use it 'several times a week' (38.7%), over 60% can be defined as an 'AI-savvy layer' that utilizes generative AI daily. In particular, 44.5% of students have used generative AI for creating job hunting documents; approximately one in two students are already utilizing it. Including those with intention to use it, this figure rises to over 80%, indicating that for students, AI has become an 'essential tool for job hunting.' Given this situation, when asked if they feel anxious about current document screening as AI usage in Entry Sheet (ES) creation becomes generalized, approximately 80% (80.5%) of students reported feeling some form of anxiety, excluding the 19.5% who said they had no particular concerns. The most common reason for this anxiety was 'because everyone uses generative AI, texts become similar and differentiation is impossible' (40.5%), followed by 'by homogenization of texts, I fear I will be filtered out based solely on surface-level specs like academic background or qualifications instead of content' (38.1%). 2. Anxiety about human-led interviews is dominated by 'interviewer lottery'; students seek 'objective and fair evaluation.' When investigating anxiety regarding human-led interviews, the most common response was 'I fear being evaluated based on an interviewer's subjectivity or prejudice (preconception)' (40.9%). This was followed by 'I fear whether success or failure will depend on compatibility with the interviewer' (37.8%) and 'I get nervous and cannot show my original ability or true self' (37.8%). Against this backdrop, the most common expectation for corporate interviews was 'objective and fair evaluation not swayed by an interviewer's subjectivity' (38.7%). 3. More than one in three students have a positive impression of 'AI interviews.' However, there is also anxiety about whether 'passion' can be conveyed. Awareness of 'AI interviews' among students has reached over 80%. Regarding impressions of 'AI interviews,' more than one in three responded they were 'positive' (34.7%).

FAQ

就職活動の書類選考において、生成AIの利用状況はどうなっていますか?

約2人に1人(44.5%)の学生がすでに書類作成に生成AIを利用しており、今後の利用意向を含めると8割以上の学生がAIを就活における必須ツールと認識しています。

学生が書類選考に対して感じている主な不安は何ですか?

約8割の学生が不安を感じており、主な理由は「みんなが生成AIを使うことで文章が似てしまい差別化できないこと(40.5%)」や「表面的なスペックだけで足切りされること(38.1%)」です。

学生が「AI面接」に対してどのような印象を持っていますか?

約3人に1人(34.7%)がポジティブな印象を持っています。一方で、ネガティブな印象を持つ学生は約1割に留まり、特に普段からAIを活用している層ほどポジティブな傾向が顕著です。

人による面接に対して学生が抱える不安要素は?

「面接官の主観や偏見で評価されそう(40.9%)」が最多で、面接官との相性や緊張による実力発揮の難しさも上位に挙げられています。

学生が企業の面接に最も期待することは何ですか?

最も多くの学生が「面接官の主観に左右されない『客観的で公平な評価』(38.7%)」を期待しています。