NTU Study: Integrating Medical and Life Support in Long-Term Care Yields Better Disability Improvement
A research team from National Taiwan University's College of Public Health released a new study on May 21, indicating that in Taiwan's super-aged society, integrating professional medical services with daily life support in long-term care leads to significantly better improvement in disability after one year compared to using life support alone. Professor Chen Ya-mei, the lead researcher, advises the public to use long-term care wisely, viewing it as an opportunity to maintain function, delay degeneration, and restore autonomy, rather than just receiving care. The study also proposes different service focuses for individuals with mild and severe disabilities and provides three self-assessment questions to determine if one is "using long-term care smartly."
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: May 21, 2026 at 18:59
- 🔍 Collected: May 21, 2026 at 19:31 (32 min after Published)
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 21, 2026 at 19:46 (14 min after Collected)
As Taiwan enters a super-aged society, many people opt for long-term care services such as bathing, cleaning, and meal preparation. However, a study by National Taiwan University (NTU) indicates that if long-term medical services are used in conjunction with life support services, the improvement in disability after one year is superior to using only life support services.
A team led by Professor Chen Ya-mei from the Institute of Health Policy and Management at NTU's College of Public Health presented their latest research today. They emphasized that using long-term care smartly is not just about receiving care, but about transforming the opportunity to use services into a chance to maintain function, delay decline, and restore autonomy.
During her presentation, Chen pointed out that Taiwan has become a super-aged society, with over 20 out of every 100 people being 65 or older, and its aging rate is outpacing other countries. Consequently, statistics estimate that the number of disabled people in the total population will reach 920,000 in 2026 and increase to 1.29 million by 2035, affecting far more than 1.29 million families.
Chen stated that as long-term care has evolved from version 1.0 to the current 3.0, the focus of services needs to shift from "is someone coming to help?" to "is the service truly helping the elderly recover or maintain function?" In other words, long-term care should not be an arrangement that starts only after disability occurs. Interventions should begin in the pre-frailty and frailty stages, using diverse activities, re-ablement training, and inter-professional services to help the elderly maintain physical, psychological, and social functions with safe support.
Chen explained the current ABC system of the long-term care service network. Level A, the flagship long-term care centers, have case managers who connect community resources. Level B, the specialized long-term care shops, provide professional medical services and life support services. Level C, the neighborhood long-term care stations, offer activities and communal dining for the elderly.
A common question from the public is how to choose from the many long-term care service items. Chen said that due to a lack of familiarity with the services, people tend to choose the most common life support services like meal preparation, cleaning, and bathing, and use fewer medical-related resources.
Chen stated that the study found that integrating medical professional services with life support resulted in better improvement in disability after one year compared to using life support alone. It is believed that a long-term care model where medical and life support services cooperate can address both the health and care needs of the elderly, allowing them to maintain their functions better.
The focus of reinforcement also differs for different elderly individuals. Chen explained that for those with mild disabilities, the use of re-ablement services can be enhanced to achieve functional recovery. For those with severe disabilities, a combination of advice from medical professional services and strengthening "participatory care" in daily life can help maintain function.
As for how the public can determine if they are "using long-term care smartly," Chen suggests asking three questions: "Does this service or activity help the elderly maintain or restore a specific daily living ability?" "Do the home care aides, day care staff, activity leaders, family members, and professionals know that the common goal is functional maintenance, rather than each doing their own thing?" "Is the elderly person encouraged to do a part of it themselves within a safe range?"
A team led by Professor Chen Ya-mei from the Institute of Health Policy and Management at NTU's College of Public Health presented their latest research today. They emphasized that using long-term care smartly is not just about receiving care, but about transforming the opportunity to use services into a chance to maintain function, delay decline, and restore autonomy.
During her presentation, Chen pointed out that Taiwan has become a super-aged society, with over 20 out of every 100 people being 65 or older, and its aging rate is outpacing other countries. Consequently, statistics estimate that the number of disabled people in the total population will reach 920,000 in 2026 and increase to 1.29 million by 2035, affecting far more than 1.29 million families.
Chen stated that as long-term care has evolved from version 1.0 to the current 3.0, the focus of services needs to shift from "is someone coming to help?" to "is the service truly helping the elderly recover or maintain function?" In other words, long-term care should not be an arrangement that starts only after disability occurs. Interventions should begin in the pre-frailty and frailty stages, using diverse activities, re-ablement training, and inter-professional services to help the elderly maintain physical, psychological, and social functions with safe support.
Chen explained the current ABC system of the long-term care service network. Level A, the flagship long-term care centers, have case managers who connect community resources. Level B, the specialized long-term care shops, provide professional medical services and life support services. Level C, the neighborhood long-term care stations, offer activities and communal dining for the elderly.
A common question from the public is how to choose from the many long-term care service items. Chen said that due to a lack of familiarity with the services, people tend to choose the most common life support services like meal preparation, cleaning, and bathing, and use fewer medical-related resources.
Chen stated that the study found that integrating medical professional services with life support resulted in better improvement in disability after one year compared to using life support alone. It is believed that a long-term care model where medical and life support services cooperate can address both the health and care needs of the elderly, allowing them to maintain their functions better.
The focus of reinforcement also differs for different elderly individuals. Chen explained that for those with mild disabilities, the use of re-ablement services can be enhanced to achieve functional recovery. For those with severe disabilities, a combination of advice from medical professional services and strengthening "participatory care" in daily life can help maintain function.
As for how the public can determine if they are "using long-term care smartly," Chen suggests asking three questions: "Does this service or activity help the elderly maintain or restore a specific daily living ability?" "Do the home care aides, day care staff, activity leaders, family members, and professionals know that the common goal is functional maintenance, rather than each doing their own thing?" "Is the elderly person encouraged to do a part of it themselves within a safe range?"
FAQ
這項台大研究的主要發現是什麼?
主要發現是,同時使用長照醫療服務與生活照顧服務的長者,一年後的失能改善情況,比只使用生活照顧服務的長者更好。
為什麼民眾傾向只選擇生活照顧服務?
根據研究,民眾對長照服務不夠熟悉,因此多選擇最常見的備餐、打掃、洗澡等生活照顧類型服務,較少使用醫療相關資源。
台灣的失能人口預估有多少?
根據統計,2026年推估全人口失能人數為92萬人,2035年將增至129萬人。
研究建議如何「聰明用長照」?
研究建議民眾可自問三個問題來判斷,包括:「這項服務是否能幫助長者恢復日常能力?」、「所有服務提供者是否有共同的功能維持目標?」、「長者是否被鼓勵在安全範圍內自己動手?」。
對於不同失能程度的長者,研究有何建議?
輕度失能者應加強使用復能服務以回復功能;重度失能者則可結合醫療專業建議與生活中的「參與式照顧」來維持功能。