Nantou Landowners Urge Rezoning of Unused School Sites Returned by Court

In Nantou County, land expropriated for schools 30 years ago but never used has been returned to owners through court rulings. However, because the land is still zoned as 'public facility reserved land,' its use is restricted, leaving it idle. County Magistrate Hsu Shu-Hua stated that a comprehensive review of 15 such sites was submitted to the Ministry of the Interior in 2022, and the county is pushing for an expedited review to protect landowners' rights.
政策NQ 67/100出典:PR Times

📋 Article Processing Timeline

  • 📰 Published: May 21, 2026 at 18:18
  • 🔍 Collected: May 21, 2026 at 18:31 (13 min after Published)
  • 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 21, 2026 at 18:47 (15 min after Collected)
(CNA reporter Hsiao Po-yang, Nantou County, 21st) In Nantou County, some land designated for schools has remained unbuilt for years. Although landowners have reclaimed the land, it lies idle due to its unresolved status as public facility reserved land, which restricts its use. The county government stated that a comprehensive review of 15 public facility sites across the county has been submitted to the Ministry of the Interior for deliberation, with some already completed. During the Nantou County Council's regular session for general interpellation today, independent County Councilor Chien Chien-Hsiang pointed out that land expropriated 30 years ago for the relocation of Dexing, Fugong, and Qiaoguang elementary schools was never used. Landowners won lawsuits to get their land back, and the county government lost the case and returned the land. After a 15-year delay, the land use zoning is still for school purposes, meaning the owners have reclaimed their land but cannot use it, leading to overgrown areas that harbor snakes and rats and have become unsanitary dead spots. Chien said that 30 years ago, with a high birth rate, it was reasonable for the county to expropriate land for school relocation. However, with the current trend of declining birth rates, elementary schools struggle to enroll students, and the reserved school land is no longer needed. He argued the county government should have proactively de-listed the school land and returned it to the people, instead of forcing landowners to spend money on lawyers to reclaim it, only to find it unusable for building houses. He stated this government inaction harms the landowners' rights. Nantou County Magistrate Hsu Shu-Hua said the county government completed a comprehensive review of 15 public facility sites in 2022 and submitted it to the Ministry of the Interior for review. Some have been completed, while 7 cases are still in the central government's review process. She noted that de-listing public facility reserved land is not just a problem for Nantou but a common issue for all cities and counties nationwide. If the central government could speed up the review process, it would help protect the rights of more citizens. Hsu Shu-Hua added that the review and project-specific changes for public facility reserved land involve complex procedures with local and central urban planning committees. Due to the lengthy review timeline, the county government will continue to track the progress with the Ministry of the Interior and will ask local legislators to help appeal to the central government, hoping to accelerate detailed planning discussions and special committee reviews to shorten the administrative process as much as possible. (Editor: Lee Hsi-chang) 1150521

FAQ

為什麼南投的學校預定地地主拿回土地後還是不能用?

因為土地雖然經法院判決歸還地主,但其「公共設施保留地」的「學校用地」分區並未解編,導致土地使用受到限制,例如不能蓋房屋。

這個問題持續多久了?

相關土地是30年前徵收的,在地主打官司拿回土地後,土地因分區未解編而無法使用的情況已拖延15年。

南投縣政府對此有何作為?

縣府已於2022年完成全縣15處公共設施用地的通盤檢討,並送交內政部審議。目前部分已完成,7案仍在審議中。

縣長許淑華提出了什麼解決方案?

縣長許淑華表示,會持續追蹤內政部的審查進度,並請在地立委協助向中央反映,希望加速審議流程,縮短行政程序。

除了南投,其他地方有類似問題嗎?

根據縣長許淑華的說法,公共設施保留地解編是全國各縣市的共同課題。