Control Yuan: Unclear Authority Between Sports, Education Ministries on Sports Class Supervision and Normalization

The Control Yuan stated on the 21st that regarding Taiwan's sports class system, the division of responsibilities between the Sports Administration (referred to as the 'Sports Department') and the Ministry of Education is unclear on key issues such as overall supervision, training hours, and educational normalization, with both sides deferring responsibility. The report also highlighted that issues like the academic gap of sports class students and violations of training hours require urgent supervision and improvement.
政策NQ 7/100出典:PR Times

📋 Article Processing Timeline

  • 📰 Published: May 21, 2026 at 13:35
  • 🔍 Collected: May 21, 2026 at 14:01 (25 min after Published)
  • 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 21, 2026 at 14:13 (12 min after Collected)
(CNA, Taipei, 21st, Reporter Kao Hua-chien) The Control Yuan said today that regarding issues with the sports class system, the division of responsibilities between the Sports Department and the Ministry of Education is partially unclear. On key issues such as the overall supervision of sports classes, training hours, and educational normalization, both ministries consider it the other's responsibility. Issues such as the academic gap among sports class students and violations of training hours also await supervisory improvement.
The Control Yuan's Committee on Education and Culture recently passed an investigation report proposed by Control Yuan members Lai Ting-ming, Puruṣa-hali, and Yeh Ta-hua.
The three investigating members stated in a press release today that to implement the purpose of sports classes, the Ministry of Education amended and promulgated regulations such as the "Regulations for the Establishment of Sports Classes in Senior High Schools and Below" in 2021, hoping to strengthen the three-tier sports training system and implement educational normalization.
The members pointed out that the division of responsibilities between the Sports Department and the Ministry of Education is partially unclear. On key issues such as "overall supervision of sports classes," "training hours and educational normalization of sports classes," and "indigenous student-athletes," both ministries claimed the issues fell under the other's jurisdiction during the information request process. They failed to respond proactively, citing reasons such as it not being their purview, being under the other's control, or needing coordination with local governments. There was no substantive conclusion on overall jurisdiction, let alone regarding the jurisdictional authority over municipalities, county/city governments, grassroots school sports classes, and their basic academic affairs.
The members noted that the problem of the basic academic gap among sports class students must be addressed. According to the Ministry of Education's data from the 111th to 113th academic years' Comprehensive Assessment Program for Junior High School Students, the proportion of sports class students scoring "To Be Strengthened (C)" in both English and mathematics exceeded 50%. Furthermore, in the 113th academic year, 35.85% of baseball-specializing students received "5C" (failing to reach the basic threshold in all five subjects), far higher than the overall student average of 6.62%.
The members said the Ministry of Education has not taken this problem seriously, nor has it actively grasped the reality and difficulties of remedial teaching for sports class students, clearly failing to fulfill its supervisory duties. They added that the cultivation of national sports talent should not come at the cost of basic academic skills, and it is urgent for the Ministry of Education to evaluate horizontal mechanisms and jointly review academic cultivation and learning support mechanisms.
The members pointed out that although most schools claim to have set academic standards for competition eligibility, according to the 2024 visit report on grassroots athlete training stations, in practice, academic tutoring is often limited to brief sessions during lunch breaks or after school. Delays in the allocation and verification of government subsidies also make it difficult to find or retain tutors on a regular basis, an issue that requires the Ministry of Education's joint resolution.
The members emphasized that "normalization of sports training" is one of the core management goals for sports classes and teams. However, inspections by the Ministry of Education over the past three years showed that sports classes in three junior high schools were in violation.

FAQ

監察院就體育班問題點出哪兩個政府部門權責不明?

監察院指出,運動部(體育署)與教育部對於體育班的整體督導、訓練時數及教學正常化等關鍵議題,部分權責分工不明確,雙方都認為屬於對方權責。

體育班學生的學力表現如何?

學力有嚴重落差。根據教育部111至113學年度國中會考數據,體育班學生在英語及數學兩科「待加強C」的比率超過五成。113學年度棒球專長學生「5C」(五科皆未達基礎)比率更高達35.85%,遠高於全體考生的6.62%。

監察院對教育部有何批評?

監察院認為教育部未正視體育班學生的學力落差問題,也未積極掌握補救教學的實況與困境,顯未善盡管考督導的義務。

體育班學生的課業輔導面臨什麼困難?

實務上,課業輔導多只能在午休或下課短暫進行。此外,政府補助經費撥付與核銷的延宕,導致課輔師資難尋或無法常態化聘任。

本次調查是由哪幾位監察委員提出的?

調查報告由監察委員賴鼎銘、浦忠成、葉大華共同提出。