NHRC Calls for Special Law to Protect Judicial Interpreters' Rights
Key facts
- NHRC Calls for Special Law to Protect Judicial Interpreters' Rights
- The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) reported serious flaws in Taiwan's judicial interpreting system, including excessive workloads and conflicts of interest, calling for a special law and a national service mechanism.
- Source: PR Times
- Date: April 29, 2026
Direct answer
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) reported serious flaws in Taiwan's judicial interpreting system, including excessive workloads and conflicts of interest, calling for a special law and a national service mechanism.
- Citation
- NHRC Calls for Special Law to Protect Judicial Interpreters' Rights (April 29, 2026), PR Times
- Source
- PR Times
- Date
- April 29, 2026
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) reported serious flaws in Taiwan's judicial interpreting system, including excessive workloads and conflicts of interest, calling for a special law and a national service mechanism.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: April 29, 2026 at 14:16
- 🔍 Collected: April 29, 2026 at 14:31 (15 min after Published)
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: April 29, 2026 at 15:36 (1h 4m after Collected)
To understand the current state of judicial interpreting and comply with international covenants on civil and political rights, NHRC Vice Chair Chi Hui-jung and Commissioner Wang Li-chen interviewed various legal professionals over the past year. Chi highlighted the 2013 'Te Hung Hsing 368' case, where the lack of professional interpreting led to critical records not being correctly preserved, affecting the defendants' rights.
Commissioner Wang identified five major difficulties for interpreters: safety concerns during searches, fear of legal liability for translation errors, excessive workload, psychological burden from body identification, and conflicts of interest. The NHRC proposed six calls for action: 1. Enact a special law for interpreters; 2. Establish a national-level service mechanism; 3. Ensure adequate budgeting; 4. Strengthen social and personal security for interpreters; 5. Use digital technology such as speech recognition; 6. Include language barriers in the scope of mandatory defense.
FAQ
What are the key facts in this article?
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) reported serious flaws in Taiwan's judicial interpreting system, including excessive workloads and conflicts of interest, calling for a special law and a national service mechanism.
What is the direct answer?
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) reported serious flaws in Taiwan's judicial interpreting system, including excessive workloads and conflicts of interest, calling for a special law and a national service mechanism.
What is the source and date?
PR Times: https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202604290127.aspx | April 29, 2026