Tainan Madou: Two Caregivers Indicted for Infant Abuse Causing Severe Injury
Key facts
- Tainan Madou: Two Caregivers Indicted for Infant Abuse Causing Severe Injury
- Two caregivers in Tainan's Madou District, Ms. Cheng and Ms. Zhang, have been indicted for allegedly abusing an 11-month-old infant, causing severe injuries including traumatic brain injury, paralysis, and vision/hearing loss. The investigation revealed illegal operation and unregistered childcare.
- Source: PR Times
- Date: April 12, 2026
Direct answer
Two caregivers in Tainan's Madou District, Ms. Cheng and Ms. Zhang, have been indicted for allegedly abusing an 11-month-old infant, causing severe injuries including traumatic brain injury, paralysis, and vision/hearing loss. The investigation revealed illegal operation and unregistered childcare.
- Citation
- Tainan Madou: Two Caregivers Indicted for Infant Abuse Causing Severe Injury (April 12, 2026), PR Times
- Source
- PR Times
- Date
- April 12, 2026
Two caregivers in Tainan's Madou District, Ms. Cheng and Ms. Zhang, have been indicted for allegedly abusing an 11-month-old infant, causing severe injuries including traumatic brain injury, paralysis, and vision/hearing loss. The investigation revealed illegal operation and unregistered childcare.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: April 12, 2026 at 14:27
- 🔍 Collected: April 12, 2026 at 16:29 (2h 2m after Published)
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: April 19, 2026 at 22:38 (174h 9m after Collected)
Prosecutors stated that Ms. Cheng and Ms. Zhang are suspected of repeatedly abusing one of the enrolled male infants between March and December 2025. It wasn't until early December that the infant, then 11 months old, showed abnormal physical conditions. Ms. Cheng contacted the infant's mother to take him to the hospital for examination. Diagnoses revealed the infant suffered traumatic brain injury with left subdural hematoma and edema, right-sided hemiplegia, epilepsy, retinal hemorrhage, and vision and hearing loss in both eyes. The infant underwent two hospital transfers for treatment including eye surgery. Hospitals diagnosed the infant with abusive brain injury combined with severe bilateral cerebral atrophy, resulting in significant impairment of vision, right limb function, hearing, and the brain, reaching the level of severe injury.
Prosecutors said that the actions of the defendants are suspected of violating the Child and Youth Welfare and Protection Act, as well as the Penal Code provisions for intentional severe injury to a child and abuse of a child under seven causing severe injury. Following the investigation, public prosecution was initiated according to law.
This case began on December 6th, 2025, when police received a report alleging that a male infant under one year old was suspected of being subjected to improper treatment during childcare, resulting in injuries such as cerebral hemorrhage. A special task force was formed and reported to the Tainan District Prosecutors Office for investigation. After gathering relevant evidence, the two suspects, Ms. Cheng and Ms. Zhang, were apprehended and brought in. After interrogation, prosecutors sought and obtained court approval for their detention.
Police also discovered that the two suspects had improperly treated other multiple infants and toddlers at the childcare facility. They proactively contacted the children's parents to undergo medical examinations and accepted related complaints. The city's Social Affairs Bureau investigated and found that only Ms. Cheng was a qualified registered caregiver and had only reported caring for two children, while illegally taking in a total of six young children. The Social Affairs Bureau revoked the license according to law and imposed fines for the violations. (Editor: Huang Ming-hsi) 1150412
FAQ
What kind of abuse led to the daycare worker's prosecution?
The daycare worker is suspected of causing severe brain damage, bleeding, paralysis, and visual and auditory impairments to an 11-month-old boy.
What issues were found in the background of the case?
It was discovered that only one registered daycare worker was illegally caring for a total of six infants and toddlers.
What actions were taken in response to this case?
Two daycare workers were prosecuted under the Child and Youth Welfare and Rights Protection Act and the Penal Code for causing serious injury. The social agency also identified the unregistered daycare operation, revoked the license, and imposed a fine.