After US President Trump's administration took office, the Pentagon restricted media access. Starting in October last year, it required reporters not to disclose unapproved information in their reports, otherwise their press passes would be revoked. This move effectively demanded that the media relinquish reporting decision-making power, drawing strong backlash from the media, with dozens of reporters returning their passes.
Agence France-Presse reported that The New York Times subsequently filed a lawsuit, and a federal court ruled in March this year that the Pentagon's new interview system last year was unconstitutional. Unexpectedly, the Pentagon then imposed even stricter restrictions.
Judge Paul Friedman stated in his ruling today: "The very next business day after the court's order was issued, the Department of Defense announced the immediate closure of the 'press corridor,' an area where reporters had worked at the Pentagon for years."
The Pentagon further completely banned reporters from entering without official escort and stated that new workspaces would be provided in "ancillary facilities."
For decades, accredited reporters from major media outlets held passes that allowed them free access to certain areas of the Pentagon to interact with officials and public affairs personnel, but the Department of Defense cited security risks as a reason for tightening restrictions.
Friedman wrote in his ruling that these escalating restrictions "were not based on security concerns, nor were they to fulfill previous commitments, and were clearly intended to circumvent the legal effect of this court's order," demanding that the Department of Defense must allow New York Times reporters and "all regulated parties" to enter the Pentagon.
Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell wrote on social media platform X today: "The Department of Defense disagrees with the court's ruling and intends to appeal." (Edited by Chang Ming-hsuan) 1150410
FACT BOX
- Source: CNA (Central News Agency)
- Category: regulation