RAN發表「赤道原則事實查核報告」

環保非政府組織RAN發表報告，指控三菱日聯金融集團（MUFG）和瑞穗金融集團在為德州里奧格蘭德液化天然氣（LNG）項目提供融資時，可能違反了「赤道原則」及其自身政策，並指出其未與原住民社群進行充分的利害關係人溝通。
Press ReleaseNQ 92/100出典：PR Times

📋 文章處理履歷

  • 📰 發表: 2026年5月21日 03:52
  • 🔍 收集: 2026年5月20日 19:32
  • 🤖 AI分析完成: 2026年5月22日 16:11（收集後44小時39分鐘）
環保非政府組織「雨林行動網絡」（RAN）發布一份事實查核報告，指控日本的MUFG和瑞穗銀行在為美國德州的里奧格蘭德LNG項目融資時，違反了赤道原則。報告強調，該項目在利害關係人溝通方面存在缺失，特別是未能取得當地原住民族「卡里索/科梅克魯多族」的「自由、事先和知情同意」（FPIC），而該族的聖地正受到影響。儘管已透過JaCER提出申訴，兩家銀行仍繼續資助該項目的擴建，RAN因此要求其立即停止所有支援。

常見問題

What is the main accusation in RAN's fact sheet?

The fact sheet accuses MUFG and Mizuho of potentially violating the Equator Principles, an international standard for managing environmental and social risk in project finance, as well as their own internal policies, by funding the Rio Grande LNG project.

Which specific principle does RAN claim was violated?

RAN points to a potential violation of Principle 5, 'Stakeholder Engagement,' alleging that the project developer has not provided continuous consultation and has proceeded without the 'Free, Prior, and Informed Consent' (FPIC) of the local Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe.

How are MUFG and Mizuho involved in the Rio Grande LNG project?

Both banks have provided significant financing for the project. For Phase 1, MUFG provided over $1.6 billion and Mizuho over $1.2 billion. They are also involved in financing and advisory roles for Phase 2.

What is the significance of the project's location?

The project, along with the adjacent Texas LNG facility, is planned on land that overlaps with the sacred sites of the Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe, an Indigenous community in the Rio Grande Valley.

What actions is RAN demanding from the banks?

RAN is demanding that MUFG and Mizuho investigate the alleged Indigenous rights violations, consult with the community to provide remedy, and halt all future financial support for the project and the companies involved.

返回 Newsroom (3)