Approximately 70% support considering 'benefit-attached tax credits' – Labor consultants emphasize whether the system will work in practice
The Research Institute of the Japan Federation of Social Insurance Labor and Social Security Attorneys surveyed its members on benefit-attached tax credits. While nearly 70% support the consideration of such a system, many emphasize the importance of practicality and operational feasibility on the front lines.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: May 22, 2026 at 19:06
- 🔍 Collected: May 22, 2026 at 10:31
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 27, 2026 at 02:39 (112h 7m after Collected)
The Research Institute of the Japan Federation of Social Insurance Labor and Social Security Attorneys (SHAROUSHI Research Institute) has conducted a survey on benefit-attached tax credits (from the perspective of comprehensive reform of social security and tax) to synthesize the views of labor consultants before the government releases specific institutional designs.
Survey Period: March 31–April 13, 2026
Method: Web-based survey; Target: Social Insurance Labor Consultants; Number of respondents: 857
[Key Points Revealed]
1. Recognition of benefit-attached tax credits as a "strong option"
- 69.6% believe it should be "considered within the comprehensive reform of social security and tax."
- 63.2% believe it is "worth considering as a low-income support measure."
- Regarding burden relief measures: 30.0% prioritize "benefit-attached tax credits," 20.9% prioritize "zero tax rate on food," and 28.5% favor "cautious examination of both." This indicates a conditional positive stance rather than unconditional support.
2. Cautious stance due to emphasis on "whether the system works in the field"
While there were many positive responses regarding the introduction of the system from the perspective of a "citizen," there was a trend toward cautious judgment from the perspective of a "social insurance labor consultant." Furthermore, there was a tendency to place importance on the "simplicity of the system," "accuracy of income assessment," and "consistency with social security."
FAQ
給付付き税額控除に対する社労士の意識調査の結果は?
約7割(69.6%)が「社会保障と税一体改革の中で検討すべき」と回答し、63.2%が「低所得者支援策として検討に値する」と認識しています。
負担軽減策として最も優先度が高いと考えられているものは?
「給付付き税額控除を優先」が30.0%で最多ですが、「食料品ゼロ税率を優先」が20.9%、「どちらも慎重に検討すべき」が28.5%となっており、単純推進ではなく条件付きで前向きな姿勢が見られます。
社労士は制度導入に対してどのようなスタンスですか?
国民としての視点では肯定的な意見が多いものの、社労士としての実務的な視点からは、制度が現場で円滑に回るかどうかを重視し、慎重な判断をする傾向があります。
今回の意識調査の対象と回答数は?
調査対象は社会保険労務士であり、有効回答数は857人です。
今回の調査はどこが実施しましたか?
全国社会保険労務士会連合会社会保険労務士総合研究機構が実施しました。