Recruitment Agents Freed from 'Back-and-Forth Emails': "Tasonal for Agents Scheduling" Alpha Version Released, Redesigning Three-Party Coordination Among Companies, Agents, and Candidates
SAIRAI Co., Ltd. has launched an alpha version of its "Tasonal for Agents Scheduling" feature, part of its AI recruitment operation platform for recruitment agents. This new feature redesigns three-party coordination among companies, agents, and candidates, aiming to eliminate the extensive time spent on back-and-forth emails and rescheduling in recruitment.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: May 1, 2026 at 08:27
- 🔍 Collected: May 1, 2026 at 00:02
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 1, 2026 at 07:19 (7h 16m after Collected)
SAIRAI Co., Ltd. (Headquarters: Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo; CEO: Mizuki Hirai), which provides AI services in the recruitment domain, announces the provision of an alpha version of its three-party scheduling function within "Tasonal for Agents," an AI recruitment operation platform for recruitment agents. Concurrently, the company has begun recruiting for pre-registration and test collaboration partners for the beta version (paid version) release scheduled for June 2026.
In recruitment, scheduling involves a "three-party" structure where an agent stands between the company and the candidate, and an enormous amount of time is spent on back-and-forth emails and rescheduling.
Existing scheduling tools are fundamentally designed for two parties, and thus largely fail to address this structural burden.
"Tasonal for Agents Scheduling" is a scheduling product that directly confronts the three-party structure of recruitment. The alpha version, as a minimal feature set, provides a mechanism where scheduling is finalized simply by issuing scheduling URLs to the company and the candidate respectively.
For the beta version in June 2026, feature enhancements are planned to cover a wider range of agent tasks, including candidate communication via email/SMS and an強化 dashboard. Please try it out by pre-registering.
Inquiries here
Background: Why is recruitment scheduling so time-consuming?
In the field of recruitment agents, from introducing one candidate until an interview is arranged, agents spend countless emails back and forth, managing progress on spreadsheets and chats. This burden is not due to a lack of effort by individual agents but is an unavoidable problem arising from the "three-party coordination" structure.
Agents act as dual intermediaries
Since an agent stands between the company's hiring manager and the candidate, all scheduling proceeds through the flow of "candidate → agent → company" and "company → agent → candidate."
Hearing the company's desired dates, conveying them to the candidate, matching them with the candidate's preferences, and reconfirming with the company if there's a discrepancy—it's not uncommon for five email exchanges just to arrange one interview.
Existing scheduling tools do not support three parties
Many scheduling tools are designed on the premise of two-party use (company ⇔ candidate, or internal team members). In the case of recruitment, even if a reservation URL is sent directly to the candidate, the coordination with the company's preferences and information sharing is disconnected, ultimately requiring the agent to manually bridge the gap.
Because the fundamental burden does not change even with the introduction of tools, many sites still revert to operations using email and spreadsheets.
Delays in coordination directly impact the success rate of introductions
Candidates are often engaged in multiple selections with multiple agents in parallel, and delays in confirming schedules directly lead to candidate withdrawal or decisions to join other companies.
For agents, the speed of scheduling is not just a matter of administrative efficiency but a KPI that directly affects the success rate itself.
Why three-party scheduling for recruitment now?
Tasonal has previously supported the automation and quality improvement of recruitment operations by providing "AI Scheduling Agent," "AI Scouting," and "AI Document Screening" for corporate hiring managers.
As adoption progressed, a common feedback from recruitment agencies was, "The scheduling task that consumes most of our time cannot be automated with two-party tools precisely because it is a three-party structure."
We believe that a product designed specifically for the operational structure of recruitment, rather than combining and using different two-party tools, is needed.
"Tasonal for Agents Scheduling" is a product that directly addresses this structure.
First, the alpha version provides a minimal set of features to establish a three-party flow, and a series of features to enhance operations will be sequentially added in the beta version in June 2026.
Three features provided in the alpha version
Scheduling is determined simply by issuing scheduling URLs to the company and the candidate, and both parties entering their availability.
Traditionally, agents would ask the company for availability → convey it to the candidate → and if there was a discrepancy, go back to the company... acting as an intermediary.
Tasonal issues separate scheduling URLs for companies and candidates, and coordination proceeds simply by both parties directly entering their preferred dates and times. This frees agents from the task of sending the same communication back and forth to both sides.
Even when an agent attends the interview, the same flow can be used.
In recruitment interviews, there are cases where not only the candidate and the company but also the agent themselves attend.
Tasonal also links with the agent's calendar, and if an agent's participation is mandatory, it extracts available slots for all three parties, including the agent's availability. The same system can be used whether or not the agent attends.
In recruitment, scheduling involves a "three-party" structure where an agent stands between the company and the candidate, and an enormous amount of time is spent on back-and-forth emails and rescheduling.
Existing scheduling tools are fundamentally designed for two parties, and thus largely fail to address this structural burden.
"Tasonal for Agents Scheduling" is a scheduling product that directly confronts the three-party structure of recruitment. The alpha version, as a minimal feature set, provides a mechanism where scheduling is finalized simply by issuing scheduling URLs to the company and the candidate respectively.
For the beta version in June 2026, feature enhancements are planned to cover a wider range of agent tasks, including candidate communication via email/SMS and an強化 dashboard. Please try it out by pre-registering.
Inquiries here
Background: Why is recruitment scheduling so time-consuming?
In the field of recruitment agents, from introducing one candidate until an interview is arranged, agents spend countless emails back and forth, managing progress on spreadsheets and chats. This burden is not due to a lack of effort by individual agents but is an unavoidable problem arising from the "three-party coordination" structure.
Agents act as dual intermediaries
Since an agent stands between the company's hiring manager and the candidate, all scheduling proceeds through the flow of "candidate → agent → company" and "company → agent → candidate."
Hearing the company's desired dates, conveying them to the candidate, matching them with the candidate's preferences, and reconfirming with the company if there's a discrepancy—it's not uncommon for five email exchanges just to arrange one interview.
Existing scheduling tools do not support three parties
Many scheduling tools are designed on the premise of two-party use (company ⇔ candidate, or internal team members). In the case of recruitment, even if a reservation URL is sent directly to the candidate, the coordination with the company's preferences and information sharing is disconnected, ultimately requiring the agent to manually bridge the gap.
Because the fundamental burden does not change even with the introduction of tools, many sites still revert to operations using email and spreadsheets.
Delays in coordination directly impact the success rate of introductions
Candidates are often engaged in multiple selections with multiple agents in parallel, and delays in confirming schedules directly lead to candidate withdrawal or decisions to join other companies.
For agents, the speed of scheduling is not just a matter of administrative efficiency but a KPI that directly affects the success rate itself.
Why three-party scheduling for recruitment now?
Tasonal has previously supported the automation and quality improvement of recruitment operations by providing "AI Scheduling Agent," "AI Scouting," and "AI Document Screening" for corporate hiring managers.
As adoption progressed, a common feedback from recruitment agencies was, "The scheduling task that consumes most of our time cannot be automated with two-party tools precisely because it is a three-party structure."
We believe that a product designed specifically for the operational structure of recruitment, rather than combining and using different two-party tools, is needed.
"Tasonal for Agents Scheduling" is a product that directly addresses this structure.
First, the alpha version provides a minimal set of features to establish a three-party flow, and a series of features to enhance operations will be sequentially added in the beta version in June 2026.
Three features provided in the alpha version
Scheduling is determined simply by issuing scheduling URLs to the company and the candidate, and both parties entering their availability.
Traditionally, agents would ask the company for availability → convey it to the candidate → and if there was a discrepancy, go back to the company... acting as an intermediary.
Tasonal issues separate scheduling URLs for companies and candidates, and coordination proceeds simply by both parties directly entering their preferred dates and times. This frees agents from the task of sending the same communication back and forth to both sides.
Even when an agent attends the interview, the same flow can be used.
In recruitment interviews, there are cases where not only the candidate and the company but also the agent themselves attend.
Tasonal also links with the agent's calendar, and if an agent's participation is mandatory, it extracts available slots for all three parties, including the agent's availability. The same system can be used whether or not the agent attends.