[Generative AI Use Leads to Unexpected "Correction Hell"?] 60% Report Needing 4+ Revisions! Practical Users Desire "Consistency Maintenance" and "Partial Rewriting"

Many companies are introducing generative AI with the aim of improving operational efficiency. However, it is suspected that challenges such as "not getting the intended results in one go" and "taking time for fine-tuning" may be burdening the actual work sites.

Therefore, this time, PRIZMA Inc. (https://www.prizma-link.com/press) conducted a survey on the "Actual State of Revisions for Generative AI Outputs" targeting men and women in their 20s to 50s who regularly use "generative AI" in their work and have experience using it for "image/video production."

The survey revealed that over 90% of generative AI users repeatedly make multiple revisions, resulting in several hours of lost time. It was found that the inability to adjust details as intended is a particular challenge in image generation and manga production.

This article introduces excerpts from the survey content. All survey results are available in a report, which can be downloaded for free from the link below. ▼Survey Results Report https://www.prizma-link.com/press/whitepaper/form/whitepaper133?utm_source=prtimes [Over 70% are Exhausted by "Revision Work".] "Revisions" in Generative AI Can Lead to Several Hours of Loss Per Project.

First, when asked "Do you feel burdened by the time and effort required for 'revising and fine-tuning' AI-generated outputs?", over 70% responded with "Feel very burdened (20.1%)" or "Feel somewhat burdened (56.3%)".

Tools originally introduced to improve operational efficiency and reduce time...