[Independent Survey] AI Overview Appearance Depends on 'How It Is Asked'
An independent survey of 33,201 Japanese Google search queries conducted between February and April 2026 revealed that the appearance rate of AI Overviews (AIO) is primarily driven by the shape of the query (such as 'what is'), rather than industry or intent.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: May 20, 2026 at 19:00
- 🔍 Collected: May 20, 2026 at 10:31
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 22, 2026 at 23:06 (60h 34m after Collected)
On the frontlines of SEO where professionals consider responses to AI Overview (AIO), comments like the following are frequently heard:
'Since we operate in the YMYL space, AIO probably won't appear much anyway.'
'Navigational searches should naturally lead to our site, so prioritizing AIO seems low.'
'AIO priority should be determined by appearance trends across different industries.'
In this survey, it was discovered that the most significant factor determining AIO appearance is neither 'industry' nor 'purchase intent', but the 'shape of the answer' the query demands.
This release shares four key facts that will serve as a reference for SEO professionals looking to reassess the priorities of their strategies.
Key Findings of the Survey
- Whether an AIO is displayed is heavily influenced by 'how the question is asked' rather than the industry.
- AIO was particularly likely to appear for searches demanding a clear answer, such as 'what is [topic]'.
- For AIO optimization, it is crucial not to treat all keywords uniformly but to prioritize them based on the 'shape of the query'.
Survey Overview
- Survey Period: February to April 2026
- Scope: 33,201 Japanese Google search queries
- Data Acquisition: Proprietary search results monitoring system
- Labeling: 5-axis automatic classification via LLM (human-verified)
- Statistical Method: Chi-square test (significant on all axes with p < 0.001)
Each query was assigned labels across 5 axes: 'Purchase Funnel Classification (INTC)', 'Content Format', 'Industry', 'Navigational/Non-navigational', and 'YMYL Status', and their relationship with the AIO appearance rate was statistically verified.
1. The Most Decisive Factor was the 'Shape of the Query'
When comparing the relationship between the 5-axis labels and the AIO appearance rate, the largest difference was found in the 'Content Format (Shape of the Query)'.
AIO Appearance Rate by Content Format (Query Format)
- Definition type ('what is'): 93.1% (3,263 queries)
- FAQ type (asking for specific facts): 84.1% (5,605 queries)
- Method type ('how to'): 77.6% (2,917 queries)
- Comparison type ('recommendation'): 77.0% (4,642 queries)
- List type ('list of'): 68.8% (5,773 queries)
- Other: 67.5% (11,001 queries)
Even when dealing with the same industry and products, there is a 16.1 percentage point difference in AIO appearance rate between 'what is [topic]' and '[topic] recommendation', and a difference of over 25 points compared to other formats. Sorting out 'which query shapes to write articles for' before deciding 'which industries to compete in' is the first step in AIO optimization.
2. 'YMYL is Unlikely to Appear in AIO' is a Misconception
There is a view that 'AIO is suppressed for health, medical, and finance topics because Google exercises caution'. However, the actual appearance rates show the opposite trend.
AIO Appearance Rate by Industry
- Health/Medical: 86.4% (917 queries)
- Legal/Professional Services: 83.9% (1,599 queries)
- Finance/Insurance: 81.1% (7,412 queries)
- Education/Learning: 76.8% (995 queries)
- IT/Technology: 76.4% (8,161 queries)
- Marketing: 74.9% (3,312 queries)
- Housing/Renovation: 74.4% (992 queries)
- Real Estate: 74.4% (944 queries)
- HR/Career: 73.3% (1,686 queries)
- Daily Life/Living: 68.5% (2,666 queries)
- Beauty/Fashion: 66.4% (1,626 queries)
- Travel/Tourism: 55.0% (591 queries)
- Dining/Gourmet: 51.6% (787 queries)
The top three industries are Health/Medical (86.4%), Legal/Professional Services (83.9%), and Finance/Insurance (81.1%), all of which are YMYL domains. While we cannot determine the exact cause from this survey alone, it is possible that AIO is more likely to appear in YMYL areas where highly reliable sources are readily available. At the very least, it is inappropriate to uniformly conclude that 'AIO is unlikely to appear because it is YMYL'.
On the other hand, the appearance rates were low for Travel/Tourism (55.0%) and Dining/Gourmet (51.6%). While the exact cause cannot be determined from this survey alone, these queries often carry strong subjectivity and local nuances, making it difficult for AI to generate a single definitive answer, which likely impacts the low appearance rates.
3. AIO Optimization Does Not Need to be Uniform Across All Keywords
'Sweet spots' that cannot be seen on a single axis have become clear through cross-tabulation.
Combinations with Particularly High AIO Appearance Rates (Priority Candidates for AIO Optimization)
- Finance/Insurance x Informational
- Legal/Professional Services x Informational
- Health/Medical x Commercial
'Since we operate in the YMYL space, AIO probably won't appear much anyway.'
'Navigational searches should naturally lead to our site, so prioritizing AIO seems low.'
'AIO priority should be determined by appearance trends across different industries.'
In this survey, it was discovered that the most significant factor determining AIO appearance is neither 'industry' nor 'purchase intent', but the 'shape of the answer' the query demands.
This release shares four key facts that will serve as a reference for SEO professionals looking to reassess the priorities of their strategies.
Key Findings of the Survey
- Whether an AIO is displayed is heavily influenced by 'how the question is asked' rather than the industry.
- AIO was particularly likely to appear for searches demanding a clear answer, such as 'what is [topic]'.
- For AIO optimization, it is crucial not to treat all keywords uniformly but to prioritize them based on the 'shape of the query'.
Survey Overview
- Survey Period: February to April 2026
- Scope: 33,201 Japanese Google search queries
- Data Acquisition: Proprietary search results monitoring system
- Labeling: 5-axis automatic classification via LLM (human-verified)
- Statistical Method: Chi-square test (significant on all axes with p < 0.001)
Each query was assigned labels across 5 axes: 'Purchase Funnel Classification (INTC)', 'Content Format', 'Industry', 'Navigational/Non-navigational', and 'YMYL Status', and their relationship with the AIO appearance rate was statistically verified.
1. The Most Decisive Factor was the 'Shape of the Query'
When comparing the relationship between the 5-axis labels and the AIO appearance rate, the largest difference was found in the 'Content Format (Shape of the Query)'.
AIO Appearance Rate by Content Format (Query Format)
- Definition type ('what is'): 93.1% (3,263 queries)
- FAQ type (asking for specific facts): 84.1% (5,605 queries)
- Method type ('how to'): 77.6% (2,917 queries)
- Comparison type ('recommendation'): 77.0% (4,642 queries)
- List type ('list of'): 68.8% (5,773 queries)
- Other: 67.5% (11,001 queries)
Even when dealing with the same industry and products, there is a 16.1 percentage point difference in AIO appearance rate between 'what is [topic]' and '[topic] recommendation', and a difference of over 25 points compared to other formats. Sorting out 'which query shapes to write articles for' before deciding 'which industries to compete in' is the first step in AIO optimization.
2. 'YMYL is Unlikely to Appear in AIO' is a Misconception
There is a view that 'AIO is suppressed for health, medical, and finance topics because Google exercises caution'. However, the actual appearance rates show the opposite trend.
AIO Appearance Rate by Industry
- Health/Medical: 86.4% (917 queries)
- Legal/Professional Services: 83.9% (1,599 queries)
- Finance/Insurance: 81.1% (7,412 queries)
- Education/Learning: 76.8% (995 queries)
- IT/Technology: 76.4% (8,161 queries)
- Marketing: 74.9% (3,312 queries)
- Housing/Renovation: 74.4% (992 queries)
- Real Estate: 74.4% (944 queries)
- HR/Career: 73.3% (1,686 queries)
- Daily Life/Living: 68.5% (2,666 queries)
- Beauty/Fashion: 66.4% (1,626 queries)
- Travel/Tourism: 55.0% (591 queries)
- Dining/Gourmet: 51.6% (787 queries)
The top three industries are Health/Medical (86.4%), Legal/Professional Services (83.9%), and Finance/Insurance (81.1%), all of which are YMYL domains. While we cannot determine the exact cause from this survey alone, it is possible that AIO is more likely to appear in YMYL areas where highly reliable sources are readily available. At the very least, it is inappropriate to uniformly conclude that 'AIO is unlikely to appear because it is YMYL'.
On the other hand, the appearance rates were low for Travel/Tourism (55.0%) and Dining/Gourmet (51.6%). While the exact cause cannot be determined from this survey alone, these queries often carry strong subjectivity and local nuances, making it difficult for AI to generate a single definitive answer, which likely impacts the low appearance rates.
3. AIO Optimization Does Not Need to be Uniform Across All Keywords
'Sweet spots' that cannot be seen on a single axis have become clear through cross-tabulation.
Combinations with Particularly High AIO Appearance Rates (Priority Candidates for AIO Optimization)
- Finance/Insurance x Informational
- Legal/Professional Services x Informational
- Health/Medical x Commercial
FAQ
AI Overview(AIO)の表示率に最も影響を与える要因は何ですか?
調査によると、AIOの表示率に最も大きな影響を与えるのは業種ではなく、「〜とは」などのコンテンツ形式(クエリの形)です。
どのような形の検索キーワードでAI Overviewが表示されやすいですか?
「〜とは」のように明確な答えを求める「定義型」クエリが最も表示されやすく、93.1%の表示率を示しました。
健康や医療などのYMYL領域では、AI Overviewは表示されにくいのでしょうか?
実際の調査結果では逆の傾向が見られます。健康・医療(86.4%)、法律・士業(83.9%)、金融・保険(81.1%)など、YMYL領域でのAIO表示率は高い傾向にあります。
旅行や飲食に関する検索ではAI Overviewは表示されやすいですか?
いいえ、旅行・観光(55.0%)や飲食・グルメ(51.6%)のクエリではAIO表示率が低くなっています。主観性やローカル性が強いためと考えられます。
効果的なAI Overview(AIO)対策の第一歩は何ですか?
「どの業種で勝負するか」の前に、「○○とは」や「○○ おすすめ」など、「どのクエリの形で記事を書くか」を整理し、クエリの形ごとに優先順位を分けることが重要です。