MAC: Beijing Need Not Rush to Criticize Call to Halt Taipei-Shanghai Forum

DPP's Taipei mayoral candidate Shen Poyang's suggestion to halt the Taipei-Shanghai City Forum due to its low efficacy drew criticism from China's Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO). Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) responded by stating the forum is a municipal, not a cross-strait, issue. The MAC clarified that the decision to hold the forum rests with the Taipei City Government and the central government's role is merely to review applications, urging the mainland side not to overreact.
政策NQ 60/100出典:PR Times

📋 Article Processing Timeline

  • 📰 Published: May 21, 2026 at 19:36
  • 🔍 Collected: May 21, 2026 at 20:01 (25 min after Published)
  • 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 21, 2026 at 20:07 (5 min after Collected)
(CNA, Taipei, 21st, by reporter Li Ya-wen) Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei mayoral candidate Shen Poyang argued that the Taipei-Shanghai City Forum offers extremely low benefits and should not be held, drawing criticism from China's Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) for "undermining cross-strait cooperation and exchange." In response, Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) stated that the forum is a municipal issue, not a cross-strait one, and the mainland side need not rush to criticize. The Mainland Affairs Council held its regular press conference this afternoon, hosted by Deputy Minister and spokesperson Liang Wen-chieh. Liang stated that the Taipei-Shanghai City Forum is a municipal issue for Taipei City, not a cross-strait issue. If the Taipei City Government believes it can obtain information or experience from exchanges with Shanghai that benefit Taipei's urban governance and development, then it is a municipal issue for Taipei. He added that Taipei has 53 sister cities worldwide and frequently engages in exchanges with them, all of which, including the Taipei-Shanghai City Forum, are municipal matters for Taipei. Liang mentioned that the Taipei City Government applies for forum-related activities according to regulations, and government agencies review them and provide reminders on certain matters. When approving the forum's activities, the government never judges whether it is helpful or beneficial for cross-strait relations, as it is purely a municipal issue. "We are just a reviewing authority," he said. He further stated that if Shen Poyang were to become the mayor of Taipei and believe that holding the forum is useless for Taipei's governance, that would also be Taipei City's affair. It has no connection to cross-strait issues, so the other side need not be in a hurry to criticize anything. On the 14th, Shen Poyang mentioned in a media interview that the forum has extremely low benefits and "things without benefits shouldn't be done." Zhu Fenglian, a spokesperson for China's Taiwan Affairs Office, stated at a regular press conference on the 20th that the forum has been held for 16 consecutive years and has achieved fruitful results. She added, "Diehard Taiwan independence separatist Shen Poyang is accustomed to spreading rumors, slandering, and attacking and undermining cross-strait exchanges and cooperation. His malicious actions will surely be despised."

FAQ

沈伯洋為何主張停辦雙城論壇?

根據報導,沈伯洋認為雙城論壇的效益極低,並表示「沒有效益的事情就不要辦」。

中國國台辦如何回應沈伯洋的主張?

國台辦發言人朱鳳蓮批評沈伯洋是「台獨頑固分子」,指其「慣於造謠汙衊、攻擊破壞兩岸交流合作」。

台灣陸委會對此爭議的立場是什麼?

陸委會副主委梁文傑表示,雙城論壇是台北市的市政議題,不是兩岸議題,其存廢應由台北市長決定,對岸(中國大陸)不用急著批評。

陸委會如何界定其在雙城論壇中的角色?

陸委會表示,他們僅是審核機關,負責審核台北市政府的申請並提醒注意事項,在批准時不會判斷論壇對兩岸關係是否有幫助。

根據新聞,雙城論壇已舉辦多久?

根據中國大陸國台辦發言人的說法,雙城論壇已連續舉辦16年。