Aesthetic Medicine Society Calls for Balance of Privacy and Safety in Clinic Recording Consensus

Following a series of secret filming incidents at aesthetic clinics, the Ministry of Health and Welfare and medical institutions reached a 4-point consensus on video recording. In response, the Taiwan Society for Aesthetic & Plastic Surgery issued a statement today, emphasizing that both privacy protection and the safety of both doctors and patients should be considered, and that isolated incidents should not lead to abandoning necessary measures.
その他NQ 0/100出典:PR Times

📋 Article Processing Timeline

  • 📰 Published: May 14, 2026 at 18:37
  • 🔍 Collected: May 14, 2026 at 19:02 (24 min after Published)
  • 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 14, 2026 at 23:56 (4h 54m after Collected)
(Central News Agency, reporter Shen Pei-yao, Taipei, 14th) In the wake of a series of secret filming incidents at aesthetic clinics, the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) and medical institutions have reached a 4-point consensus on video recording, including a ban on surreptitious recording devices. The Taiwan Society for Aesthetic & Plastic Surgery issued a statement today, emphasizing that both privacy protection and the safety of both doctors and patients should be taken into account, and that one should not 'stop eating for fear of choking' due to isolated controversies.

On the afternoon of the 13th, the MOHW's Department of Medical Affairs held a meeting and gathered representatives from major medical institutions to form a 4-point consensus: 1. Strict prohibition on the use of surreptitious recording devices. 2. Standard cameras may be installed in public areas for public safety. 3. Recording in low-privacy spaces like general consultation rooms is permissible with consent. 4. Recording in high-privacy spaces like operating rooms is prohibited in principle.

The Taiwan Society for Aesthetic & Plastic Surgery issued a statement today pointing out that in recent years, with the frequency of medical disputes and violence, some medical institutions have installed fixed surveillance equipment in non-private or public areas. The main purpose is to ensure patient safety, maintain medical order, handle emergencies, and preserve objective evidence. This is fundamentally different from malicious acts like secret filming, and distributing or trading private images, and should not be judged by the same standards.

Dr. Chen Chun-kuang, President of the Taiwan Society for Aesthetic & Plastic Surgery, stated that the real focus of society should be on whether the equipment installation complies with regulations, whether the installation location infringes on privacy, whether the purpose of recording is legitimate, and whether the related images are illegally leaked, exchanged, sold, or otherwise improperly used, rather than stigmatizing all recording equipment.

The Taiwan Society for Aesthetic & Plastic Surgery emphasized that medical institutions are prohibited from using surreptitious recording devices, and any behavior involving secret filming or infringing on patient privacy should not exist in a medical setting. However, society should also rationally distinguish the fundamental difference between 'illegal invasion of privacy' and 'equipment installed for medical safety management needs,' to avoid 'stopping eating for fear of choking' due to isolated controversies and completely negating reasonable and necessary safety management measures in medical settings.

The Taiwan Society for Aesthetic & Plastic Surgery stated that trust between doctors and patients has always been the most important core foundation of the medical profession. Only by establishing a treatment environment that combines safety, respect, professionalism, and protection of the rights of both parties can public trust in the medical profession be continuously deepened, and the sound and long-term development of the overall medical environment be promoted. (Editor: Chang Ya-ching) 1150514