National Education Alliance: Gender Equality Education Act Causes Collective Anxiety in Schools, Proposes 3 Directions for Amendment
Taiwan's National Education Alliance (NEA) points out that the current Gender Equality Education Act causes collective anxiety in schools and advocates for amendments at a legislative hearing. The NEA highlights three issues: 'ambiguous boundaries,' 'harmful procedures,' and 'lack of education,' proposing amendments in three directions: clarifying definitions, streamlining case handling, and returning to education. Specifically, they argue for adjusting the legal responsibility for mandatory reporting and introducing a 'good faith judgment' exemption clause to prevent educators from over-reporting due to administrative pressure.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: April 15, 2026 at 15:26
- 🔍 Collected: April 15, 2026 at 15:31 (5 min after Published)
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: April 15, 2026 at 17:30 (1h 58m after Collected)
Central News Agency
(Central News Agency reporter Chen Chih-chung, Taipei, 15th) The Legislative Yuan is reviewing the Gender Equality Education Act. The National Education Alliance (NEA) stated that the current regulations cause collective anxiety in schools, including ambiguous boundaries, harmful procedures, and lack of education, with investigation units being overburdened. They call for amendments in three major directions: clarifying definitions, streamlining case handling, and returning to education.
The Legislative Yuan held a public hearing today to discuss the 'Gender Equality Education Act,' which came into effect in 2024, inviting representatives from various sectors.
The National Education Alliance simultaneously issued a press release, calling for amendments to move towards 'clarifying definitions,' 'streamlining case handling,' and 'returning to education' to ensure that teacher-student relationships do not collapse due to legal procedures.
Chang Wen-chang, a standing director of the NEA, summarized three typical cases in schools: first, 'ambiguous boundaries,' such as a teacher being accused and reported by students for inappropriate remarks when teaching gender perspectives in classical literature classes.
The second category is 'harmful procedures,' Chang Wen-chang said, such as emotional friction or verbal jokes between young students, which are escalated to formal investigations due to mandatory reporting regulations; even if ultimately unsubstantiated, it can cause irreparable psychological trauma.
Chang Wen-chang stated that the third category is 'lack of education,' where the current system focuses on apprehending and punishing, while the aspect of cultivating abilities is weaker; for example, if a student, unable to handle breakup emotions, frequently sends messages causing harassment, the school's first response is to report rather than provide professional emotional counseling.
Chang Wen-chang suggested that the amendments should separate 'sex health education' and 'emotional education' from the Gender Equality Education Act; establish a case streaming mechanism, so not all cases adopt a single high-intensity investigation procedure; and adjust the legal responsibility for mandatory reporting, clearly stipulating a 'good faith judgment' exemption clause to prevent educators from over-reporting due to administrative pressure. (Editor: Wu Su-jou) 1150415
Choose to stand with facts, every sponsorship you make is the power to protect press freedom.
Download the Central News Agency 'First-hand News' APP to stay updated with the latest news.
Text, images, and videos on this website may not be reproduced, publicly broadcast, or publicly transmitted and used without authorization.
(Central News Agency reporter Chen Chih-chung, Taipei, 15th) The Legislative Yuan is reviewing the Gender Equality Education Act. The National Education Alliance (NEA) stated that the current regulations cause collective anxiety in schools, including ambiguous boundaries, harmful procedures, and lack of education, with investigation units being overburdened. They call for amendments in three major directions: clarifying definitions, streamlining case handling, and returning to education.
The Legislative Yuan held a public hearing today to discuss the 'Gender Equality Education Act,' which came into effect in 2024, inviting representatives from various sectors.
The National Education Alliance simultaneously issued a press release, calling for amendments to move towards 'clarifying definitions,' 'streamlining case handling,' and 'returning to education' to ensure that teacher-student relationships do not collapse due to legal procedures.
Chang Wen-chang, a standing director of the NEA, summarized three typical cases in schools: first, 'ambiguous boundaries,' such as a teacher being accused and reported by students for inappropriate remarks when teaching gender perspectives in classical literature classes.
The second category is 'harmful procedures,' Chang Wen-chang said, such as emotional friction or verbal jokes between young students, which are escalated to formal investigations due to mandatory reporting regulations; even if ultimately unsubstantiated, it can cause irreparable psychological trauma.
Chang Wen-chang stated that the third category is 'lack of education,' where the current system focuses on apprehending and punishing, while the aspect of cultivating abilities is weaker; for example, if a student, unable to handle breakup emotions, frequently sends messages causing harassment, the school's first response is to report rather than provide professional emotional counseling.
Chang Wen-chang suggested that the amendments should separate 'sex health education' and 'emotional education' from the Gender Equality Education Act; establish a case streaming mechanism, so not all cases adopt a single high-intensity investigation procedure; and adjust the legal responsibility for mandatory reporting, clearly stipulating a 'good faith judgment' exemption clause to prevent educators from over-reporting due to administrative pressure. (Editor: Wu Su-jou) 1150415
Choose to stand with facts, every sponsorship you make is the power to protect press freedom.
Download the Central News Agency 'First-hand News' APP to stay updated with the latest news.
Text, images, and videos on this website may not be reproduced, publicly broadcast, or publicly transmitted and used without authorization.
FAQ
Why is the National Education Alliance calling for amendments to the Gender Equality Education Act?
They believe the current act causes collective anxiety in schools due to ambiguous boundaries, harmful procedures, and a lack of educational focus.
What are the three directions for amendment proposed by the National Education Alliance?
Clarifying definitions, streamlining case handling, and returning to education.