Iran's Supreme Leader Approves Memorandum to End Conflict with U.S., Expresses Personal Reservations
Key facts
- Iran's Supreme Leader Approves Memorandum to End Conflict with U.S., Expresses Personal Reservations
- Iran’s Supreme Leader has approved a memorandum to end the conflict with the U.S., citing presidential assurances regarding the protection of national interests as the basis for the decision.
- Source: PR Times
- Date: June 19, 2026
Direct answer
Iran’s Supreme Leader has approved a memorandum to end the conflict with the U.S., citing presidential assurances regarding the protection of national interests as the basis for the decision.
- Citation
- Iran's Supreme Leader Approves Memorandum to End Conflict with U.S., Expresses Personal Reservations (June 19, 2026), PR Times
- Source
- PR Times
- Date
- June 19, 2026
Iran’s Supreme Leader has approved a memorandum to end the conflict with the U.S., citing presidential assurances regarding the protection of national interests as the basis for the decision.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: June 19, 2026 at 04:46
- 🔍 Collected: June 19, 2026 at 08:38 (3h 51m after Published)
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: June 19, 2026 at 08:38 (0 min after Collected)
TEHRAN — Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, announced on the 18th that he has approved a memorandum of understanding (MOU) aimed at ending the Middle East conflict, though he explicitly stated he holds a 'different view' on the matter.
In a written statement broadcast on state television, Mojtaba Khamenei explained that his approval was granted because President Masoud Pezeshkian, in his capacity as chairman of the Supreme National Security Council, provided personal assurances that the rights of Iran and the 'Resistance Front' would be protected. The Supreme Leader emphasized that President Pezeshkian pledged not to concede to excessive demands from Washington.
The memorandum was signed by U.S. President Donald Trump and President Pezeshkian. Mojtaba remarked that the U.S. side sought the agreement out of desperation. He further clarified that engaging in future face-to-face negotiations with the U.S. does not constitute an endorsement of the 'enemy's positions.'
Mojtaba Khamenei succeeded his father, Ali Khamenei, who was killed in a joint U.S.-Israeli airstrike on February 28. This event served as the catalyst for the current conflict. This marks the first time the younger Khamenei has addressed the ceasefire agreement since taking office.
In a written statement broadcast on state television, Mojtaba Khamenei explained that his approval was granted because President Masoud Pezeshkian, in his capacity as chairman of the Supreme National Security Council, provided personal assurances that the rights of Iran and the 'Resistance Front' would be protected. The Supreme Leader emphasized that President Pezeshkian pledged not to concede to excessive demands from Washington.
The memorandum was signed by U.S. President Donald Trump and President Pezeshkian. Mojtaba remarked that the U.S. side sought the agreement out of desperation. He further clarified that engaging in future face-to-face negotiations with the U.S. does not constitute an endorsement of the 'enemy's positions.'
Mojtaba Khamenei succeeded his father, Ali Khamenei, who was killed in a joint U.S.-Israeli airstrike on February 28. This event served as the catalyst for the current conflict. This marks the first time the younger Khamenei has addressed the ceasefire agreement since taking office.
FAQ
Why did the Supreme Leader approve the agreement despite his reservations?
He approved it based on assurances from President Pezeshkian that the agreement would safeguard Iran’s national interests and the rights of the Resistance Front.
What is the context of the current conflict?
The conflict began following a joint U.S.-Israeli airstrike on February 28 that resulted in the death of the former Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei.
What are the key facts in this article?
Iran’s Supreme Leader has approved a memorandum to end the conflict with the U.S., citing presidential assurances regarding the protection of national interests as the basis for the decision.