US Judge Blocks Trump's H-1B Visa Fee Hike to $100,000, Rules It Illegal
A US federal judge has blocked former President Trump's measure requiring employers to pay $100,000 for H-1B work visa applicants, ruling it violates Congress's taxing power and constitutes an illegal tax. This ruling conflicts with another court's decision, and the case is under appeal.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: June 9, 2026 at 11:26
- 🔍 Collected: June 9, 2026 at 11:36 (10 min after Published)
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: June 9, 2026 at 11:37 (0 min after Collected)
(Central News Agency, Washington, 8th, Combined Foreign Reports) A US federal judge on Tuesday blocked a measure by former President Donald Trump that required employers to pay $100,000 (approximately NT$3.18 million) for H-1B work visa applicants.
According to AFP, in a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic-led states, Federal District Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that, first, the measure infringes upon Congress's taxing power, and second, the H-1B visa fee constitutes an illegal tax.
In a 42-page ruling, Judge Sorokin stated, "Regardless of its name, the substance and application of this $100,000 payment demonstrate that it is a tax." He noted, "The President has neither the power nor the authorization to levy a tax on H-1B visa applications."
However, another federal judge ruled in a separate lawsuit last December that the $100,000 fee was legal, and that case is currently under appeal. That lawsuit was filed by the pro-business lobbying group US Chamber of Commerce and the Association of American Universities, which represents approximately 69 top research universities nationwide.
The US H-1B visa allows companies to bring in overseas professional talent. Approximately 85,000 slots are issued annually through a lottery system, with Indian nationals accounting for about three-quarters of applicants.
Trump announced last September that he would raise the application fee from a maximum of $5,000 to $100,000. He argued at the time that the current system was being abused, with companies using it to hire foreign workers willing to accept lower wages, thereby replacing American workers.
However, tech entrepreneurs, including Trump's former ally Elon Musk, had warned the Trump administration against targeting the H-1B visa. They emphasized that the US lacks sufficient domestic talent to fill critical positions in the tech industry. (Editor: Cai Jiamin) 1150609
According to AFP, in a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic-led states, Federal District Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that, first, the measure infringes upon Congress's taxing power, and second, the H-1B visa fee constitutes an illegal tax.
In a 42-page ruling, Judge Sorokin stated, "Regardless of its name, the substance and application of this $100,000 payment demonstrate that it is a tax." He noted, "The President has neither the power nor the authorization to levy a tax on H-1B visa applications."
However, another federal judge ruled in a separate lawsuit last December that the $100,000 fee was legal, and that case is currently under appeal. That lawsuit was filed by the pro-business lobbying group US Chamber of Commerce and the Association of American Universities, which represents approximately 69 top research universities nationwide.
The US H-1B visa allows companies to bring in overseas professional talent. Approximately 85,000 slots are issued annually through a lottery system, with Indian nationals accounting for about three-quarters of applicants.
Trump announced last September that he would raise the application fee from a maximum of $5,000 to $100,000. He argued at the time that the current system was being abused, with companies using it to hire foreign workers willing to accept lower wages, thereby replacing American workers.
However, tech entrepreneurs, including Trump's former ally Elon Musk, had warned the Trump administration against targeting the H-1B visa. They emphasized that the US lacks sufficient domestic talent to fill critical positions in the tech industry. (Editor: Cai Jiamin) 1150609
FAQ
What is the current H-1B visa application fee?
It was up to $5,000, but the increase to $100,000 has been blocked by a court.
Is this ruling final?
No. Another court ruled it legal, and that case is under appeal.
Why was the $100,000 fee ruled illegal?
The federal judge ruled the fee is essentially a tax, and the President lacks the power to levy taxes.