[Unimicron] Announcement regarding independent directors expressing a reserved opinion on Audit Committee agenda items
Two independent directors of Unimicron expressed a reserved opinion on an agenda item related to the Hong Kong IPO application of its subsidiary, Suzhou Qunce Technology, requesting a legal explanation. The proposal was approved after the explanation was provided.
📋 Article Processing Timeline
- 📰 Published: May 22, 2026 at 09:00
- 🔍 Collected: May 25, 2026 at 08:00 (71h 0m after Published)
- 🤖 AI Analyzed: May 25, 2026 at 08:08 (8 min after Collected)
1. Date of Board of Directors, Audit Committee, or Compensation Committee: 115/05/22
2. Agenda item type: Audit Committee
3. Name and brief biography of the independent director or committee member expressing opposition or reserved opinion:
Chen Lai-Chu / Independent Director of the Company
Li Ya-Ching / Independent Director of the Company
4. Proposal subject to opposition or reservation:
Third discussion item:
The requirement to issue six declaration letters and other documents for the main board IPO application of the subsidiary, Suzhou Qunce Technology Co., Ltd., on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
5. Reasons for the opposition or reservation:
Reserved opinion: Proposed that the Board of Directors request an online attendance of a lawyer to provide supplementary explanations before proceeding with the Board resolution.
6. Response measures:
Following a supplementary explanation provided by the lawyer via online attendance requested by the Board, all attending directors (including all independent directors) unanimously agreed to approve the proposal. The company has published the material information in accordance with regulations.
7. Other matters: None.
2. Agenda item type: Audit Committee
3. Name and brief biography of the independent director or committee member expressing opposition or reserved opinion:
Chen Lai-Chu / Independent Director of the Company
Li Ya-Ching / Independent Director of the Company
4. Proposal subject to opposition or reservation:
Third discussion item:
The requirement to issue six declaration letters and other documents for the main board IPO application of the subsidiary, Suzhou Qunce Technology Co., Ltd., on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
5. Reasons for the opposition or reservation:
Reserved opinion: Proposed that the Board of Directors request an online attendance of a lawyer to provide supplementary explanations before proceeding with the Board resolution.
6. Response measures:
Following a supplementary explanation provided by the lawyer via online attendance requested by the Board, all attending directors (including all independent directors) unanimously agreed to approve the proposal. The company has published the material information in accordance with regulations.
7. Other matters: None.
FAQ
Is it common for independent directors to express a reserved opinion?
Yes, it is a legitimate part of their duty to request clarification when there are concerns, ensuring robust corporate governance.
What is the purpose of this proposal?
To complete the necessary legal procedures and documentation for the subsidiary's IPO on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
Why was the attendance of a lawyer required?
To ensure accurate information sharing through direct explanations from legal experts regarding the IPO process.