[Survey] Generative AI in Sales Document Creation: Insights from 293 Professionals

Key facts

  • [Survey] Generative AI in Sales Document Creation: Insights from 293 Professionals
  • Slide Team Inc. surveyed 293 sales professionals on their use of generative AI for document creation. While over 60% reported reduced creation time, challenges persist, including prompt engineering complexity, verification burdens, and design limitations.
  • Source: PR Times
  • Date: June 8, 2026

Direct answer

Slide Team Inc. surveyed 293 sales professionals on their use of generative AI for document creation. While over 60% reported reduced creation time, challenges persist, including prompt engineering complexity, verification burdens, and design limitations.

Citation
[Survey] Generative AI in Sales Document Creation: Insights from 293 Professionals (June 8, 2026), PR Times
Source
PR Times
Date
June 8, 2026
Slide Team Inc. surveyed 293 sales professionals on their use of generative AI for document creation. While over 60% reported reduced creation time, challenges persist, including prompt engineering complexity, verification burdens, and design limitations.
調査NQ 80/100出典:PR Times

📋 Article Processing Timeline

  • 📰 Published: June 8, 2026 at 19:39
  • 🔍 Collected: June 8, 2026 at 10:51
  • 🤖 AI Analyzed: June 8, 2026 at 11:16 (25 min after Collected)
Slide Team Inc. (Sapporo, Hokkaido; Representative Director: Maiki Takahashi) conducted a survey of 293 sales professionals regarding the use of generative AI in document creation.

The results revealed that 65.2% of sales professionals feel burdened by document creation tasks. While 58.9% of AI users reported reducing creation time by over 30%, challenges remain, such as the burden of prompt engineering, verification, and the tendency for documents to look like generic "AI-generated" designs.

Key Highlights:
- Over 60% of sales staff feel burdened by document creation.
- Approximately 1/3 of AI users feel they have reduced creation time by 30-40%. About 1/4 reported cutting time by more than half.
- Only about half of the respondents currently use generative AI, suggesting an emerging productivity gap between companies.
- Significant challenges remain regarding prompt creation for ideal outputs and the time needed for verification and corrections.
- "Generic AI-like design" is a noted issue, creating quality concerns for executive and client-facing documents.

Survey Details:
1. Burden: 65.2% find document creation burdensome, with 40% spending more than 6 hours per week on it.
2. AI Adoption: 53.9% use generative AI. Top services are ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini.
3. Usage: Primarily for customer proposals, meeting minutes, and reports; specifically for drafting/summarizing and brainstorming.
4. Efficiency: Nearly 60% reported a reduction of 30% or more in creation time.
5. Challenges: Difficult prompt creation, accuracy concerns, design homogenization, revision efforts, and template compatibility.

FAQ

How much do sales representatives feel burdened by creating materials?

65.2% of sales representatives feel burdened by creating materials.

What percentage of sales representatives use generative AI for creating materials?

53.9% of the surveyed sales representatives use generative AI for creating materials.

What is the time-saving effect of implementing generative AI?

Approximately 60% of users reported reducing their material creation time by more than 30%.

What are the challenges when using generative AI?

The challenges include the difficulty of creating prompts, the need to check and correct generated content, and the tendency for the AI to produce designs that are too typical of generative AI.

What are the most commonly used generative AI services by sales representatives?

The most commonly used services are ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini.